WHY ARE EGYPTIANS PROTESTING IN FRONT OF THE AMERICAN EMBASSY?

WHY ARE EGYPTIANS PROTESTING IN FRONT OF THE AMERICAN EMBASSY?

Posted on September 15, 2012

This is an email comment I got from a friend in America in reaction to the demonstrations that arose in Cairo over the reprehensible inflammatory anti-Muslim film “The Innocence of Muslims.”

She wrote: “Muslims need to get a thicker skin. Can you imagine Americans rioting every time someone said something offensive against a Christian or Jew?”

My answer: No, I can’t because Christians and Jews are well off in America today. They are not down-graded or tortured or jailed just for living their lives. Their futures have not been stolen from them by their governments and outside forces that support dictators that rule over them. No, they are OK, they have the freedom to just ignore such offenses.

But I can imagine another scenario that would set people aflame. It already happened once, I was there. The Rodney King riots (Los Angeles 1992) were set off because an unknown uneducated black man name Rodney King did not get justice. This started riots, far far worse than the peaceful demonstrations here in Cairo. Widespread looting, assault, arson and murder occurred during the riots in Los Angeles, and estimates of property damages topped one billion dollars.

Contrast this to these past days in Egypt. Egyptians burnt one American flag. There was no looting, arson or murder. Egyptians did not loot or burn buildings or shoot people, as happened during the Rodney King riots. What do Egyptians and African Americans have in common? Why did they both react so strongly to injustice and indignity?

Because the ground was fertile. Both groups already felt down-trodden. They already felt that they have suffered and continue to suffer from racism, economic exclusion, horrible schools and horrendous housing and severe disenfranchisement. They have already lost so much and have so little. What does the African American have left in the inner city? And the Egyptians in their impoverished nation, ruled over by an American backed dictator Hosny Mubarak for 30 years?

They have their dignity.

Just imagine if someone from another culture or country made a horrendous video that depicted Martin Luther King, Jr. as a child molester, a murder, a rapist, a liar, a cheat and ignorant buffoon. Just imagine if such a horrible video was made and sent from another country to the US and targeted African Americans and was seen by millions. I can well imagine that there would be a huge reaction, not unlike the demonstrations we are seeing here in Egypt over the reprehensible depiction of the Prophet Mohamed

Just as Muslims the world over hold the Prophet Mohamed in great regard, so do the African American people hold MLK in great regard, as do many others the world over. African Americans and many Muslims (certainly the poor down trodden of Egypt) have been so disenfranchised and treated so poorly and have so little except their dignity. When their dignity is also attacked – their reaction, quite naturally, is to defend their dignity. I imagine poor African Americans would do the same in the example I sight above. They did so when Rodney King was not given justice.

Maybe this example will ring true for you and maybe now you will begin to see things from another perspective, not through the eyes of privileged American living with dignity in a nice home, and has never felt the sting of racism and the pain of utter injustice — but through the eyes of a down trodden poor African American who has little to hold on to but dignity, or a poor Egyptian who has lived under a repressive dictatorship and has been beaten, imprisoned or has lost a brother or a job or just never could get a job — a person that is left with only his/her dignity. Can you see through their eyes? Can you see why it would send spurs of hurt and anger to those two different peoples from different parts of the world. Can you imagine how they feel when their prophet, or icon, or their mentor, is treated with such disrespect? It is easy to have “thick skin” and not care about such offenses when you have everything you need and you are not disenfranchised. However, when you have nothing left but your dignity, you will hold on with all your might.

Muslims may very well need thicker skins (and not react to such provocations) while privileged Western societies need to learn respect for others. And most important – Western governments must walk the walk – not only talk the talk of democracy – Western governments must STOP backing dictators who destroy their countries and peoples. The dictators and their allies in the West are responsible for the tremendous frustration and injustice the people on the street are now protesting against.

Can you now see through another’s eyes and understand?

Advertisements

Libyan President says attack against US Consulate was pre-planned by extremists

For those of you that think the Libya attack against the US Consulate was about the controversial anti-Islam film, look at this Al Jazeera video interview with the Libyan President who says otherwise. While the movie may enrage many, the actions happening across the Middle East are about deeper issues and they are led not by the mainstream Muslim but by extremists. http://aje.me/SMIUoC

Inside the strange Hollywood scam that spread chaos across the Middle East

If you are interested to truly understand the situation which is unfolding here in EGYPT – which the NY TImes and WSJ got all wrong because they did not really investigate – Then read: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/13/egypt-li…See More

Inside the strange Hollywood scam that spread chaos across the Middle East

A group of rightwing extremists aimed to destabilize post-Mubarak Egypt and roil US politicians. They got their wish

by Max Blumenthal
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 13 September 2012 17.00 BST

The Innocence of Muslims
Palestinians protest against The Innocence of Muslims. Officials confirmed ‘Sam Bacile’ was an alias used by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula. Photograph: EP

Did an inflammatory anti-Muslim film trailer that appeared spontaneously on YouTube prompt the attack that left four US diplomats dead, including US ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens? American officials have suggested that the assault was pre-planned, allegedly by of one of the Jihadist groups that emerged since the Nato-led overthrow of Libya’s Gaddafi regime. So even though the deadly scene in Benghazi may not have resulted directly from the angry reaction to the Islamophobic video, the violence has helped realize the apocalyptic visions of the film’s backers.

Produced and promoted by a strange collection of rightwing Christian evangelicals and exiled Egyptian Copts, the trailer was created with the intention of both destabilizing post-Mubarak Egypt and roiling the US presidential election. As a consultant for the film named Steve Klein said: “We went into this knowing this was probably going to happen.”

The Associated Press’s initial report on the trailer – an amateurish, practically unwatchable production called The Innocence of Muslims – identified a mysterious character, “Sam Bacile”, as its producer. Bacile told the Associated Press that he was a Jewish Israeli real estate developer living in California. He said that he raised $5m for the production of the film from “100 Jewish donors”, an unusual claim echoing Protocols of the Elders of Zion-style fantasies. Unfortunately, the extensive history of Israeli and ultra-Zionist funding and promotion of Islamophobic propaganda in the United States provided Bacile’s remarkable statement with the ring of truth.

Who was Bacile? The Israeli government could not confirm his citizenship, and for a full day, no journalist was able to determine whether he existed or not. After being duped by Bacile, AP traced his address to the home of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a militant Coptic separatist and felon convicted of check fraud. On September 13, US law enforcement officials confirmed that “Sam Bacile” was an alias Nakoula used to advance his various scams, which apparently included the production of The Innocence of Muslims.

According to an actor in the film, the all-volunteer cast was deceived into believing they were acting in a benign biblical epic about “how things were 2,000 years ago”. The script was titled Desert Warrior, and its contents made no mention of Muhammad – his name was dubbed into the film during post-production. On the set, a gray-haired Egyptian man who identified himself only as “Sam” (Nakoula) chatted aimlessly in Arabic with a group of friends while posing as the director. A casting notice for Desert Warrior listed the film’s real director as “Alan Roberts”. This could likewise be a pseudonym, although there is a veteran Hollywood hand responsible for such masterpieces as The Happy Hooker Goes Hollywood and The Sexpert who goes by the same name.

Before Nakoula was unmasked, the only person to publicly claim any role in the film was Klein, an insurance salesman and Vietnam veteran from Hemet, California, who emerged from the same Islamophobic movement that produced the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik. Styling themselves as “counter-Jihadists”, anti-Muslim crusaders like Klein took their cues from top propagandists like Pamela Geller, the blogger who once suggested that Barack Obama was the lovechild of Malcolm X, and Robert Spencer, a pseudo-academic expert on Muslim radicalization who claimed that Islam was no more than “a developed doctrine and tradition of warfare against unbelievers”. Both Geller and Spencer were labeled hate group leaders by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Klein is an enthusiastic commenter on Geller’s website, Atlas Shrugged, where he recently complained about Mitt Romney’s “support for a Muslim state in Israel’s heartland”. In July 2011, Spencer’s website, Jihad Watch, promoted a rally Klein organized to demand the firing of Los Angeles County sheriff Lee Baca, whom he painted as a dupe for the Muslim Brotherhood.

On his personal Facebook page, Altar or Abolish, Klein obsesses over the Muslim Brotherhood, describing the organization as “a global network of Muslims attacking to convert the world’s 6 billion people to Islam or kill them”. Klein urges a violent response to the perceived threat of Islam in the United States, posting an image to his website depicting a middle-American family with a mock tank turret strapped to the roof of their car. “Can you direct us to the nearest mosque?” read a caption Klein added to the photo.

In 2011, during his campaign to oust Sheriff Baca, Klein forged an alliance with Joseph Nasrallah, an extremist Coptic broadcaster who shared his fear and resentment of the Muslim Brotherhood. Nasrallah appeared from out of nowhere at a boisterous rally against the construction of an Islamic community center in downtown Manhattan on September 11, 2010, warning a few hundred riled-up Tea Party types that Muslims “came and conquered our country the same way they want to conquer America”.

Organized by Geller and Spencer, the rally was carefully timed to coincide with the peak of the midterm congressional election campaign, in which many rightwing Republicans hoped to leverage rising anti-Muslim sentiment into resentment against the presidency of Obama.

Through his friendship with Nasrallah, Klein encountered another radical Coptic separatist named Morris Sadek. Sadek has been banned from returning to his Egypt, where he is widely hated for his outrageous anti-Muslim displays. On the day of the Ground Zero rally, for instance, Sadek was seen parading around the streets of Washington, DC, on September 11, 2010, with a crucifix in one hand and a Bible implanted with the American flag in the other. “Islam is evil!” he shouted. “Islam is a cult religion!”

With another US election approaching, and the Egyptian government suddenly under the control of the Muslim Brotherhood, Klein and Sadek joined Nakoula in preparing what would be their greatest propaganda stunt to date: the Innocence of Muslims. As soon as the film appeared on YouTube, Sadek promoted it on his website, transforming the obscure clip into a viral source of outrage in the Middle East. And like clockwork, on September 11, crowds of Muslim protesters stormed the walls of the US embassy in Cairo, demanding retribution for the insult to the prophet Muhammad. The demonstrations ricocheted into Libya, where the deadly attack that may have been only peripherally related to the film occurred.

For Sadek, the chaos was an encouraging development. He and his allies had been steadfastly opposed to the Egyptian revolution, fearing that it would usher in the Muslim Brotherhood as the country’s new leaders. Now that their worst fears were realized, Coptic extremists and other pro-Mubarak dead-enders were resorting to subterfuge to undermine the ruling party, while pointing to the destabilizing impact of their efforts as proof of the government’s bankruptcy. As Sadek said, “the violence that [the film] caused in Egypt is further evidence of how violent the religion and people”.

For far-right Christian right activists like Klein, the attacks on American interests abroad seemed likely to advance their ambitions back in the US. With Americans confronted with shocking images of violent Muslims in Egypt and Libya on the evening news, their already negative attitudes toward their Muslim neighbors were likely to harden. In turn, the presidential candidates, Obama and Romney, would be forced to compete for who could take the hardest line against Islamic “terror”.

A patrician moderate constantly on the defensive against his own right flank, Romney fell for the bait, baselessly accusing Obama of “sympathiz[ing] with those who waged the attacks” and of issuing “an apology for America’s values”. The clumsy broadside backfired in dramatic fashion, opening Romney to strident criticism from across the spectrum, including from embarrassed Republican members of Congress. Obama wasted no time in authorizing a round of drone strikes on targets across Libya, which are likely to deepen regional hostility to the US.

A group of fringe extremists had proven that with a little bit of money and an unbelievably cynical scam, they could shape history to fit their apocalyptic vision. But in the end, they were not immune to the violence they incited.

According to Copts Today, an Arabic news outlet focusing on Coptic affairs, Sadek was seen taking a leisurely stroll down Washington’s M Street on September 11, soaking in the sun on a perfect autumn day. All of a sudden, he found himself surrounded by four angry Coptic women. Berating Sadek for fueling the flames of sectarian violence, the women took off their heels and began beating him over the head.

“If anything happens to a Christian in Egypt,” one of them shouted at him, “you’ll be the reason!”

A group of rightwing extremists aimed to destabilize post-Mubarak Egypt and roil US politicians.